Pros and Cons of Social Networking

One pro of social networking is that the sites can increase voter participation. According to www.pewinternet.org, “Facebook users who visit the site more than once a day were 2.5 times more likely to attend a political rally or meeting, 57% more likely to persuade someone about a vote, and 43% more likely to say they will vote”. This is very important because visiting social networking sites like Facebook, might get/encourage more of the younger generations to vote. This is beneficial because then the elected government officials will represent a wider range and more diverse people, thus affecting public policy in a more reflective way of the general population. Having social networking sites like Facebook definitely have effected me just like the statistics show. This election season, I actually found out about a political rally near me due to an event that I saw when I checked my Facebook. My boyfriend, our roommate, and I went, and we loved the experience. I am now more political then ever before. I feel like the source of pewinternet.org is reliable because it is a research center that does not take policy positions. 

One con of social networking is that is can cause people to spend less time interacting face-to-face. According to www.annenberg.usc.edu, a Jan. 2012 center for the Digital Future at the USC Annaberg School study found that the percentage of people reporting less face-to-face time with family in their homes rose from 8% in 2000 to 34% in 2011. This is bad because that number is rising fast, and I’m sure in 2016 today, that number is a lot higher. These numbers rising can cause stress within relationships, and I definitely feel like this impacts me. Whenever I go over to my parents house,  I find myself and my parents constantly checking our phones. Also, the same thing happens when I’m with my boyfriend. It’s a lot easier to look at our phones and connect with the online world then make actual conversation, and this is a problem. If our younger generation doesn’t know how to actually have a conversation without our phones, then how are we going to survive in the actual world where it is mandatory that we do so? I definitely trust the source of www.annenberg.usc.edu, because it is an educational website for the School for Communication and Journalism.

Celebrities vs. Regular People

We care so much about celebrities because they have symbolic meaning-we attach greater significance to them than we do to a regular person. Having celebrities to follow does the same thing as older forms of media-it can distract us and sensitize us to the human condition. When we are having a bad day, we can look at the newest story about Lindsey Lohan getting arrested, again, and it will make us feel good about ourselves. Also, if our lives are boring and we do the same thing over and over again everyday, we get enjoyment out of watching celebrity drama that lets us escape our boring lives for even just a moment.

Also celebrities provide narrative. Narrative gives us: Verisimilitude (connection to reality), identification (connection with ourselves), stakes (feeling that this matters), and suspense (an unknown ending). We get pleasure from the presence of these narratives, because like I said earlier, it helps us get distracted from our otherwise boring lifestyle. Celebrities are followed and photographed constantly, and by having these celebrities to look after, we are able to see the celebrity lifestyle without having to actually experience all the downfalls, like having to deal with paparazzi or having to deal with your secrets getting out and creating a scandal. In other words, we can experience the drama without having to experience the consequences of the drama. 

Social Currency

Birchbox: I believe birchbox has a way of making people feel like insiders. It is $10 a month and you get beauty samples to try before making any actual purchases. The cool thing is that you can review these samples and rack up points. Also, every time you purchase full size products you get points. When you get 100 points, you get $10 credit to use for buying full size products. Birchbox also has an ACE program, where if you get 500 points within a years time, you get to be an ACE, and you get exclusive offers and free shipping off everything. I have a birchbox, and I found myself spending a little more money every time to achieve this ACE status, which I eventually did. This also relates to the leveraging of game mechanics because it encourages people to spend more to achieve that ACE status. Birchbox also builds a good game. Whenever someone achieves ACE status, they get a little ACE symbol by their name so whenever they review products, people know they are ACEs and they are important. This can encourage people to want to become the ACE status and spend a little more money.

https://www.birchbox.com

Starbucks Rewards Program: Starbucks offers a rewards card to their customers, and after a certain amount of visits or after a certain amount of money spend, you get a free drink, no matter the cost of that drink. I would consider this leveraging game mechanics because the reward that you get after spending a certain amount of money makes you want to spend more money to get that free drink. The Starbucks rewards card also can make people feel like insiders. They offer a Gold level to anyone who has visited Starbucks a certain amount of time in a year (for example it used to be 30 visits), and after you became a Gold member you got more perks than the green level (like free refills on coffee when in store, and double star rewards on certain days). This makes people want to achieve gold status even if the rewards aren't that much different. The rewards program also builds a good game. When you achieve gold status, you get an actual Gold card sent to you in the mail, so when you are buying your drinks, people know that you are a gold status and that you are important. Also they make the color Gold because that color usually resembles rich and powerfulness. This may make more people want to achieve this gold status.

https://www.starbucks.com/card/rewards

“It Works”: I have seen a lot of posts about “It Works” on my timeline on Facebook. I would say that this could be seen as a “remarkable” social currency because it shows before and after pictures of people using their products and it seems pretty amazing what their transformations are. It can also make people feel like insiders because I believe if they become distributers of “It Works” they can get discounts on products and can get money from selling it. I feel like they can definitely leverage game mechanics as well, because sometimes they run deals like “buy 2 get 1 free!” of whatever products they're selling. So if someone only really wanted to buy one of the products, they’ll be more likely to buy a second one if they are getting another one for free.

https://www.myitworks.com

Secret Ink

Many individuals use tattoos for identity expression and formation, and yet a lot of these individuals keep the existence of their tattoos secret from the general public. This is the “mixed message” that the author is talking about. Why do we keep these things hidden from the general public? I think it’s because people still attribute negative consequences with getting tattoos and having the general public see them. For example, if a person has a visible tattoo on their arm, a company may not hire them because they feel this tattoo may interfere with their business. Also people feel a need to justify their tattoos. For example, in the reading it says, “tattooees often feel pressured to give accounts of their tattoos to others in order to justify what is an otherwise ‘socially undesirable’ act”. So while half of all adolescents have seriously considered getting a tattoo, most likely a lot of them will be getting them in places where people won’t see them.

Cultivation Theory and John Oliver

The definition of the Cultivation Theory from Wikipedia is "The more time people spend 'living' in the television world, the more likely they are to believe social reality portrayed on television. This idea is very important because John Oliver was talking about how the idea of torture is influenced by the tv shows/movies that portray torture.

John Oliver talked about how 69% of people think that waterboarding is torture. Then he talked about how 57% of people think that these torture tactics work and help prevent terror attacks, when in reality these torture tactics don't really work as often as we think. The reason we think these tactics work, is because we see on tv shows/movies (like 24, as John Oliver mentioned) where the torture tactics ALWAYS work, and because we see this in this popular culture, we believe it is the same in real life, when it's really not. John Oliver was talking about how when they were torturing people to figure out where Saddam Hussein, the two people who actually gave information, ending up giving either false or ridiculous information and it didn't really help us that much.

Why We Play vs. Jane McGonigal

In "Why We Play", we see a lot of benefits and reasons why we play video games. In the Jane McGonigal Ted Talk, she also talked about some health benefits for playing video games. They do have a few overlaps that I will discuss.

First, in "Why We Play" starting on page 56, the author talks about how playing video games can reduce stress in our lives. It talks about how playing video games make us feel safe because we can explore a whole different world with new experiences, and we don't have to worry about that negatively effecting our actual lives. In Jane McGonigal's Ted Talk, she talks about how people with depression and other disorders often feel like there is nothing they can do to help themselves, but when they play video games, it can make them happy. Jane talks about how it will help them not suffer during their pain.

Second, in "Why We Play", on page 58, the author talks about how video games can help keep social contact between people. Video games have always had some type of social aspect, whether you are playing against another person, playing on the same side with someone, or even just having something mutual to talk about with people if they play the same games. In Jane McGonigal's Ted Talk, she talks about how important our social contact is for living longer. She talks about how games definitely help us stay connected with friends and family. She also talks about how games can help us not have the regret of not spending enough time with people you love, when you're reflecting your life in your final years.

Men vs Women in Popular Culture

Both men and women’s bodies are used for advertising in popular culture. Both of them are considered “athletic bodies” and try to convince people that they need to look like that. Also both the men and women are used for sex appeal. We see this in People’s magazines’ “Sexiest man of the year”, and we know that women are sexually objectified all the time and their sex appeal is used to sell objects.

The type of body both men and women have to achieve is “athletic”, but they are both completely different body types. For men, they have to be muscular and have 6 pack abs. For women, they have to be skinny, and can’t be too curvy or they might be considered fat. If a woman had a bunch of muscles and 6 pack abs, we wouldn't view them as feminine. We would view them as masculine, and not appealing.

Football High

One example of BIRGing that I saw in "Football High" was when the coach was talking about how once the team started winning, everyone knew who they were, and you could see people wearing their apparel, even when they weren't playing. Also the pastor and other people would say "we" when talking about the team. The fans of the Shiloh team would take the team's successes as their own successes in a way. They also talked about how much money they put into the football program, and that a big majority of the guys who go to their high school, are in the football program. It just shows that because the team is doing well, football becomes everyone's lives.

An example of CORFing that I saw would be when they were talking about other teams that they may play, they sort of demonize them in a way by saying that no one was as good as them and they would beat anyone. Also, after Shiloh lost to that #1 team in the nation, Trinity High School, they sort of blamed it on the fact that they had bigger guys and were just physically outmatched.

Sports

I believe the purpose of sports is mainly to provide entertainment and to express our need to win and compete. I know a lot of people who also play sports so they can stay healthy and in shape, and also just because they love the game and think it's fun. I think sports can be for anyone, but I feel like more people watch men's college and professional teams over women's. I don't know if that is because men are seen as better at sports than women, or if men's sports are just more entertaining to some people, but you hear a lot more people watching the men's Iowa Hawkeye basketball team, and barely any watch the women's team.

I believe there are a lot of benefits to having sports in America. I think one important benefit is that it keeps a lot of people, especially young children/teens, in shape and helps combat the obesity epidemic. Also I think sports provide an activity for young people that can keep them out of trouble. Also I think a lot of people first learn teamwork skills in sports as children.

Along with benefits, there are drawbacks as well. I think that a major one is that a lot of young people get pressured into playing sports by their parents (who most likely played sports in their younger years), and they may not be happy. Another drawback would be that playing sports may lead to people getting injured at a young age, especially in football.

I feel like sports are a HUGE deal in America, and I don't really see a lot wrong with that so I don't think we need to change it. However, at the same time, some people may take sports way to far and put too much pressure on the athletes.

"Say Yes to the Dress" vs "The Rise of the Lavish Wedding"

I think one of the first connections I saw between the TV show and the reading would be the reference to princesses or royalty. In the reading it talks about how everybody started wearing white gowns AFTER Queen Victoria’s wedding. It shows that even back then, every woman wanted to look like royalty. This compares to the TV show because a ton of the women were talking about how they wanted to look like Princess Diana or Grace Kelley, because they wanted to look like royalty.

Another connection I saw was how much department stores were gaining from women wanting to look like royalty and spending a ton of money on their wedding dresses. I saw this in the reading when it talked about how much retailers were making off these brides by advertising the level of importance of having the perfect wedding. I saw this in the TV show when I saw how high the women’s budgets were and how they were willing to push the budget a little to get that “perfect” gown.

Sexual Objectification

According to Caroline Heldman, there are a few things that are sexually objectifying in this Bavarian Bier Cafe Ad. One way that this is sexually objectifying is that the image suggests that sexual availability is the defining characteristic of these women. They are not doing anything but showing off their breasts, as if that is the only thing about them that matters. I also feel like this image could be showing the ladies as a commodity. I think this because it is comparing the women's breasts to the rack of ribs, showing that if you buy these ribs, you can also get the women's breasts. This ad is for a cafe in Germany, and they actually ended up pulling the ad because it was so controversial.

According to Caroline Heldman, there are multiple things here that show it is sexually objectifying this woman. For one, this image is suggesting that the sexual availability is the defining characteristic of this woman. She is not doing anything, she is just casually leaning on this bottle of Budweiser.  I could also see this image as treating this sexualized woman's body as a canvas, because she is about the same size as the bottle and is in front of the bottle so we can't really see it because the woman is the only thing that matters. I could also see this image as showing this person as a commodity. I think this because she is in front of the actual product being sold, which to me makes me think that the message is that if you buy this bottle of alcohol, you also get this attractive woman.

Duke Porn Star Student

I focused on the news groups "The Young Turks" and "The View". It seemed like The Young Turks talked a lot about how unfair it is for her personal business to be leaked to the world, while The View was more focused on getting the girl's side of the story and the people on the show didn't really say much. The Young Turks thought that making fun of her for her personal life is "going too far" and that they shouldn't be bullying her when it's her own life choice. They also said that the girls at Duke who were talking bad about her were just mad because of her financial opportunity, and the guys were just mad because she hasn't slept with them. The View just focused on practically her life story. "Belle Knox" says that she has watched porn since she was 12, and one of the ladies said that that made her sad that she has watched porn since she was that young, and they were also very surprised because she said that her parents supported her porn choice. We also got to see how much she makes from these porn videos ($1000-$1500) and how often she does them (25-30).

I believe that The Young Turks focuses more on defending the girl because they are more laid back and have a lot of young viewers, whereas The View may have not provided a lot of opinions because it is more formal and a lot of older people or middle-age people watch that. So I feel like The View doesn't want to offend any of their viewers by supporting the girl or attacking her because a lot of people watch that show and might have conflicting opinions, whereas I feel like less people watch The Young Turks so they don't have to worry as much about offending anyone.

The Young Turks mainly had young people talking about this issue, while the View had more middle-aged or older people talking about the issue. I feel like that age group and how they talked about this topic really reflect our attitudes towards sex and pornography. I feel like the older people in The View seemed less accepting because in their generation, sex and porn wasn't accepted as much as it is in this generation. I feel like The Young Turks were more accepting because they have grown up in this generation where sex and porn aren't that risqué anymore.